# Customising the electronic signature widget **URL:** https://community.tulip.co/t/customising-the-electronic-signature-widget/9080 **Category:** Product Suggestions **Tags:** electronic-signature **Created:** [August 16, 2023, 1:12pm UTC](https://community.tulip.co/t/customising-the-electronic-signature-widget/9080 "2023-08-16T13:12:48Z") **Posts on this page:** 1 **Showing post:** 2
### Author: ![ASharp-J](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.tulip.co/asharp-j/32/3820_2.png) [@ASharp-J](https://community.tulip.co/u/ASharp-J) #### Post date: [August 22, 2023, 1:32pm UTC](https://community.tulip.co/t/customising-the-electronic-signature-widget/9080/2 "2023-08-22T13:32:57Z")
I completely agree with Mark Stuttard on this topic! Integrating the new signature widget is not so smooth both from an aesthetic point of view (it would be nice to adapt into color scheme and/or change color based on variable), but also ensuring that data is complete before the signature pop up is shown. If there e.g. were triggers available “when signature button is clicked” we could institute a check that all data is complete prior to showing the end user the signature pop up and running the trigger. ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/agilemfg/original/2X/5/54bf2b955b3d39f1c19a74524317c2526342523e.png) We haven’t changed our design yet to accommodate LTS10, but unless the widget is changed we would need to make separate step - similar to the “Signature Form” steps - where data is presented and signature widget is included. Then we implement the check on the trigger allowing user to move to data presentation step. I hope it makes sense 🙂 --- _[View the full topic](https://community.tulip.co/t/customising-the-electronic-signature-widget/9080)._