An app has a name, and that’s it, right? There is not like an ID and a description for an app?
As a result, we “name” the app with both an ID number and a description, like so:
The ID (100-0282) corresponds to our ERP. The rest of the name is for a human being looking at Tulip.
As I discussed yesterday, the only way to open an app from a trigger is by “name.”
I guess there are two paths:
- The “name” becomes the ID, and then add a description field
- The “name” becomes the description, and add an ID field that I can call from a trigger (so that I have two ways to open an app via trigger - name or ID.
I’m partial to #2, and I would think that would have the least impact on Tulip also.