Identify operators without requiring them to sign in

Hi. I am looking for a way to let multiple operators enter the data into Tulip using the same tablet. I need to identify who the operator is but I don’t want them to sign in with their account every time. How can I make a dropdown menu, where each operator assigned to this station can choose their name from the list without the need for signing in?

Do I need to use tables functionality and assign it with variables?
Can the app user list function the same way as the tables?

hello @Andres, and welcome to the Tulip Community!!

you can certainly embed a Users Table and tie it to a Record Placeholder. at that point, you can tie the completion back to the selection of the User without having to sign an operator in:

and regarding your second question, you can certainly use the Users Table in the same way as the regular Table. for example, this Trigger sends an SMS when a specific User is selected from the Users Table:


does this answer your questions?? let us know if we misunderstood something!!

and again, welcome to the Tulip Community

Hi Andres,
as far as i know you can not store easily a table list to a dropdown, until a loop is implemented.
But if you know the table id of the records you like to store in a dropdown, you can step the table index through all records and push the record onto an array.
This array is assigned as the dropdown variable.
Using this in a step open trigger, you get an array with all selectable employee (in the example: MA) for using in the app.

Hope this helps
Regards Chris

Hi,

We just started with Tulip and we are working on building a production tracking app for an assembly station that generally has more than one operator working on the same work order.
We would like on app start to configure the station with one of them logging in as the App User, manually selecting the other colleagues working with him and select a work order to begin working.
On completion we would like to save the performance of the job and tie it to each operator as their individual performance for that work order.
At the same time, the results of that work order should record the fact that there were multiple operators on that job.

@gio , in your example the selection was for a single operator. Can it work for multiple ones? And how should the data be saved in tables? Should it have multiple columns for each operator slot?

Thank you!
Alin.

For multiple operators, you would still use an operator table to manage operators. You’ll also use at least one additional table, depending on how your work order tables are set up. If you have one main work order table, adding a column for each operator will work. As you add more fields (columns), records (rows), and tables you might need to adjust the setup to optimize for performance.

1 Like